搜索

聯合國要廢除繁體中文

[複製鏈接]
大便高達 發表於 29/8/2008 17:13:54 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式 IP:- 香港
聯合國話要正式廢除繁體中文 , 但係到而家全世界都得28萬人反對 (因為有好多人唔識睇果張英文反對文件) .
所以請各位大哥大姐幫幫手, 入 www.gopetition.com/region/237/8314.html  在頁底按 Sign the petition ,
寫好張 form 就 send 出去啦 , 多謝咁多位

Description/History:
The Chinese language has many dialects spoken yet Mandarin has always been the official language.

In Mandarin, there are two present types of writings: Traditional and Simplified Chinese characters. Traditional Chinese has been the official form of writing for thousands of years. And from it, the Simplified form was born.

In recent decades, China's effort in trying to make Chinese easier for both her youth and foreigners resulted in this push of Simplified Chinese. However, at the same time, Traditional Chinese is still studied and widely recognized.

The purpose of Simplified Chinese was meant for an easier reading (with less characters) and less pen-strokes in writing characters. It is the attempt of making Chinese more phonetic rather than having many words pronounced the same.

The two forms of Chinese have always co-existed peacefully for many years. The importance of Traditional Chinese lies in the fact that each character represents a very specific meaning. This is of extreme importance because it allows the reader to understand a written word even without the word being in context.

Simplified Chinese, although convenient, fails to incorporate meaning into its characters. Many words of same phonetic sounds are replaced by a single character that possesses the same sound but lacks in meaning. The major downfall of Simplified Chinese is that it lacks meaning. Currently, historical texts are in Traditional Chinese, (simply because one can read and understand based on the author's choice of words) however, if Traditional Chinese is to be replaced by Simplified Chinese, one would not be able to understand these texts/writings because words have lost their meanings, they simply represent a way of pronouncing the texts. As time progresses, this would result in the loss of history and culture.

UN's action to "unify" the Chinese characters and recognize ONLY Simplified Chinese will have devastating impact upon the Chinese language, culture, history. Internationally, Traditional Chinese would be forgotten and neglected, it would only be a matter of time before Traditional Chinese becomes the next "Latin". (the dead language) Along with this loss of language, would be a culture and history lost forever.

Although Simplified Chinese is an easier way to learn Chinese, but it should not be the only form of Chinese written language. It should be a convenience, not an absolute. By allowing it to become the "official" writing, the Chinese language would be in regression.

[ 本帖最後由 大便高達 於 2008-8-29 21:01 編輯 ]
肥東 發表於 29/8/2008 17:54:04 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
我send 左了
 樓主| 大便高達 發表於 29/8/2008 18:02:40 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
肥東 發表於 29/8/2008 18:12:45 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
原帖由 大便高達 於 2008-8-29 18:02 發表

唔該晒 , 祝你釣魚永無打龜 , 想果條釣果條 .


傻啦~洗咩唔該我haha~
只係我覺得有問題姐haha
你都係呀祝你釣魚永無打龜 , 想果條釣果條 .
water1208 發表於 29/8/2008 18:53:28 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
我都sent左啦!!!
 樓主| 大便高達 發表於 29/8/2008 19:58:14 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
原帖由 water1208 於 2008-8-29 18:53 發表
我都sent左啦!!!

Thx
perseus 發表於 29/8/2008 20:43:18 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
師兄可以細心諗下聯合國係咩組織,所以佢有咩權同能力去癈除一種文化同文字呢?
 樓主| 大便高達 發表於 29/8/2008 20:57:55 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
原帖由 perseus 於 2008-8-29 20:43 發表
師兄可以細心諗下聯合國係咩組織,所以佢有咩權同能力去癈除一種文化同文字呢?

我D 英文真係有限公司, 但我感覺到下列句中所講D野好似對繁體字會有好大影響 [ UN's action to "unify" the Chinese characters and recognize ONLY Simplified Chinese will have devastating impact upon the Chinese language, culture, history. Internationally, Traditional Chinese would be forgotten and neglected, it would only be a matter of time before Traditional Chinese becomes the next "Latin". (the dead language) Along with this loss of language, would be a culture and history lost forever .]
orzpopo 發表於 29/8/2008 22:05:56 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
原帖由 大便高達 於 2008-8-29 20:57 發表

我D 英文真係有限公司, 但我感覺到下列句中所講D野好似對繁體字會有好大影響 [ UN's action to "unify" the Chinese characters and recognize ONLY Simplified Chinese will have devastating impact upon the Chi ...


小弟d英文都唔係好好,盡力幫師兄翻譯下la,出錯唔好介意
段野大約內容係:
聯合國今次廢除繁體中文係對中國語言,文化及歷史有絕對既影響,繁體中文會漸漸隨時間被遺忘及變成Latin(唔用既語言)
今次既廢除既語言,會令文化及歷史永遠消失


先唔好理聯合國點解要廢除先
但係佢地知唔知道簡體字係繁體字簡化出黎?
舊時中國好多文盲,為左令多d中國人識下字,咁就將繁體字簡化之後教俾國民
中國久而久之就會多人識簡體而唔識繁體,最後國家先認定簡體字係中國既官方文字
咁點解聯合國要廢左一種原本既文字而要用一種演變出黎既文字呢?
況且佢憑d乜野去廢除呢?
呢一d係中國最基本亦最有特色既文化
英文字都唔會好似中文字咁樣由d國畫慢慢變出黎la
咁樣同直接廢掉人地國家既文化有咩分別?
仲有最重要,就算佢廢除左有冇人跟佢先

[ 本帖最後由 orzpopo 於 2008-8-29 22:09 編輯 ]
 樓主| 大便高達 發表於 29/8/2008 23:27:18 | 顯示全部樓層 IP:- 香港
原帖由 orzpopo 於 2008-8-29 22:05 發表


小弟d英文都唔係好好,盡力幫師兄翻譯下la,出錯唔好介意
段野大約內容係:
聯合國今次廢除繁體中文係對中國語言,文化及歷史有絕對既影響,繁體中文會漸漸隨時間被遺忘及變成Latin(唔用既語言)
今次既廢除既語言,會令 ...

其實我諗聯合國係想將簡體字定做中國唯一正式文字 , 當然, 就算佢地真係通過左, 對繁體字都唔會立刻有影響, 但當一種文字越來越小人用, 咁果種文字就會漸漸俾人淡忘 , 咁以後又會多一樣文字在世上消失 .
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 魚民註冊

本版積分規則

手機版|聯繫魚樂網|FISHINGHK.com™  

GMT+8, 29/12/2024 19:15 , Processed in 0.368416 second(s), 34 queries , Gzip On, File On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 © 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

System by FISHINGHK.com Since 2007-2-16

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表